The Hero? Or the Villain?

During a recent discussion with a fellow writer concerning character traits, we talked a bit about heroes and villains and how most villains don’t go around calling themselves the villain in their head. Some villains do, like in Dr. Horrible’s Sing-a-Long Blog, but I think that’s a rather unique example. This really got me thinking about different perspectives on heroes and villains.

For me, the biggest defining feature of a hero versus a villain is sacrifice. And by hero, I don’t just mean some poor schmuck who is in the wrong place at the wrong time and doing everything possible just to keep themselves alive during the zombie-pocalypse. I guess I am talking about heroes as defined by their villains. Kind of like Superman and Lex Luthor. Without a super villain to define his own heroics, would Superman have really been considered that much of a hero? But that might either be a topic for later or another post entirely.

A hero is always willing to sacrifice everything, including their own life, to save the lives of innocent people. A hero generally fights because they feel as though they have a responsibility to do so, as though they were granted either certain powers or a certain skill set that ought to be used to help people who lack the ability to protect themselves from aliens, monsters (both of the human and inhuman variety), thieves, criminals, murderers, etc. The villain is always intent on personal gain, usually in the form of profit, power, world domination, special influence, or other nefarious gains, but they tend to do so with the intention of making the world a more structured or better organized place.

So where is the boundary between the self-sacrifice the hero willing assumes responsibility for and the sacrifices the villain forces upon the hero? The villain almost always finds a way to manipulate the hero by using those the hero loves against them. Family, friends, loved ones. They all wind up as pawns for the villains and their schemes. Most of the heroes find ways to foil the villainous plot by saving the world and the person they love, but every now and then, the hero is forced to choose the fate of the world or the fate of the one person they love, be it a family member or a romantic interest. The hero is screwed no matter what decision they make because there are always going to be people on either side, outsiders looking in, who will chastise them for making the choice they did, for choosing to save one side instead of the other.

From the view of the public, every action a hero takes will be criticized and demonized. There will always be people who will watch every step a hero takes and castigate them for everything. Take the example of Spider-Man and J. Jonah Jameson, where Spider-Man saves the city all the time, but J. Jonah Jameson always puts a negative spin on Spider-Man’s actions. Most of the time, those who criticize the most would make the worst heroes and make more mistakes than the heroes they criticize.

But then the interesting point comes up about property and what happens to the cities that are destroyed during the conflicts between the heroes and the villains? Do the heroes have a responsibility to stay and use their superpowers to clean up the mess? Can you imagine how much faster the debris would be cleaned up and the city rebuilt if people with superhuman speed and strength stuck around to repair the damages? Or would allowing them to use their unique skills in that manner then take work and jobs away from the average working citizen and cause harm to the local economy? That’s just more proof that heroes really won’t be able to get anything right, no matter how many people they save. It’s all just a matter of perspective. One person’s hero is another person’s villain.

So how do we, as writers, convince the readers to view our characters as the heroes, or get the audience to cheer for our villains? I would say the key is sacrifice. Your characters have to give something up. Personal freedom, money, glory, something that would matter greatly to them if it was lost. In most cases, the hero gives up their very identity – their sense of self. Peter Parker has to watch his actions be ridiculed every day by the man he works for and say nothing. If the audience builds strong emotional attachments to the characters, even when they do something that could be morally wrong, the audience forgives them or makes excuses for them almost immediately. I can think of a recent example from the Hunger Games trilogy by Suzanne Collins, but I don’t want to say too much because I don’t want to include anything for people who may not have finished reading the books. There is definitely a time in those books where Katniss takes some actions that could be seen as morally wrong, but by that time and everything Katniss has been through, I know I was willing to pretty much overlook some of the less moral actions she took.

Hero or villain, as the writer, build emotional attachments between your audience and your character so the audience forgives your characters for their trespasses.

Advertisements

About C.A. Jacobs

Just another crazy person, masquerading as a writer.
This entry was posted in Writing. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Hero? Or the Villain?

  1. Joe Pineda says:

    The reason villains don’t go calling themselves such is because, if you think about it carefully, the most interesting villains are those who believe to be right about their ways. If they were to call themselves villainous outright, that would be the same as reiterating they are evil, and therefore you have a bland good versus evil story. A villain with a purpose builds emotional attachment the same way a hero who tries really hard does.

    • C.A. Jacobs says:

      Exactly! If you look at what Star Wars Episodes I through III were attempting to show with the transition of Anakin Skywalker to Darth Vader, you see that he was just working to bring order throughout the galaxy in a more timely manner than the constant debates that happened throughout the council sessions. The story could have been portrayed much better, and a more believable transition from hero to villain could be seen with what the Smallville series did with young Lex Luthor and how he became the super villain and arch-nemesis of Superman. Lex Luthor’s intentions started out as noble, but he kept running into a variety of situations where he was manipulated by either his own desire to control more power, or the power he already wielded wound up controlling him. Most of the villains see themselves as working to prevent chaos or working to bring a greater sense of order to a system they see as corrupt and broken.

      • Joe Pineda says:

        And on the other hand, it’s very hard to like a hero who always succeeds (unless he’s something like Japanese comic icon Golgo 13 lol). Some of the most memorable heroes are the ones who try really hard, sometimes numerous times before succeeding.

  2. Good job maintaining focus on such a ‘big question’ topic. Spiderman seems to exemplify the difference between a hero who pretends to be a normal person (ie pretends to be clark kent) and a normal person who chooses to use his powers to be a hero (ie chooses to be spiderman rather than remaining peter parker). The ‘hero who seeks to protect vs villain who seeks to control’ dichotomy is workable, but only up to the gray area of ‘well meaning’ villains, who do not resent the average person so much as merely doubt their capacity to rule themselves. Could this be compared to the hero’s doubt that the average person could protect themselves from an above average villain? There might be an emerging attempt by the global consciousness to answer this question in movies like Transformers and The Avengers, where ‘super’ and ‘mortal’ heroes work together on almost equal footing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s